This interpretive framework, which once dominated antislavery historiography, had been discounted by historians for two basic reasons. 这种解释框架曾主导过反奴隶制的史学,但由于两个基本原因,它已被历史学家所忽视。
This early-twentieth-century historiography nonetheless represented the leading research on dissent in the South until the 1960s and 1970s. 尽管如此,直到20世纪60年代和70年代,这种二十世纪早期的史学仍然代表了对南方异见的主要研究。